The NUB codec is properly installed if you see these messages
I think you mean not. That's what I get for installing in the wrong directory. BTW I hope you're planning to remove this restriction at some point. There's no reason to hardcode the install directory (in the final product 😊 ).
This CODEC is freely distributable for non-commercial uses. So DO feel free to send it to your friends -- zipped up it's less than 100K so it's a no brianer to send.
IMHO, you really don't need to do the conversion because you can simply distribute the CODEC. It provides an alternative high-quality MPEG-4 encoder/decoder to you for FREE.
That's reasonable enough, but I have two points to make...
1) I don't want it.
I want to put my videos on a web page where people can click on a link and the following happens:
. The video downloads
. The video plays
Now that, my friend, is a no brainer 😊
I'm happy to see that your codec allows me to do this.
2) I can get better compression without apparently compromising the image.
I recorded these files with Camcorder Pro (Beta):
. monkey.eye (408kb)
. monkey.ear (128kb)
. kitchen.eye (185kb)
. kitchen.ear (56kb)
EyeCon turned those files into:
. monkey.nub.avi (766kb)
. kitchen.nub.avi (407kb)
(I renamed the files to include '.nub'😉
Using VirtualDub on the above files, with following settings:
. Video: Full process mode. Compression - Indeo 5.1. Quality - 75%.
. Audio: Direct stream copy.
produces these files:
. monkey.indeo.avi (552kb)
. kitchen.indeo.avi (216kb)
Now I'm no expert, but I can see no difference between the NuB and Indeo videos playing them at normal size, side by side. I can see a difference if I enlarge a frame in each video to fullscreen, so that I can see the colours of individual pixels. Some of the pixels are slightly different colours. To my eyes the difference is very small. I'm sure that most people would find this 'change' in quality acceptable.[/url]