Read-only archive of the All About Symbian forum (2001–2013) · About this archive

Symbian, Microsoft and Palm to have 0% of market in 2007?

3 replies · 2,914 views · Started 20 July 2002

A feature by Michael McCarthy on the Wireless Resource Centre reports on a speech made by Stewart Walsop (a venture capitalist) where he discussed who will be on top of the market in 2007. He says that it won't be Nokia, Handspring or Microsoft. In fact, he says that these will have 0% of the market, each. He is putting his money on BREW.

Some of his argument centres on the fact that he doesn't reckon on users wanting to use their phones for word processing and the like (because they interfere :roll: , while putting a camera on a phone is just silly (we'll see about that eh?);

[quote="Wireless Resource Center"]
It's important to note that you can work statistics in this industry any way you like, but there is still one bottom line. For example, of the 900 million cell phones sold worldwide in 2001 (compare to 120 million PCs!), more than half were bought as replacements. But 100% were bought so people could talk to other people.

The key lesson: To most of your customers, a cell phone is first and foremost a telephone. Features and applications that help people make a phone call are playing into this key fact. Features and apps that get in the way of people talking on the phone are likely to fail.

So at the top of the list are features that enhance the telephone experience. His example: an integrated directory lookup service that can check any phonebook anywhere to find a phone number and dial it.

Next on the list are apps that fill time between calls�games, location services, chat�because they don't interfere with talking on the phone.

At the bottom of this list are apps that interfere with calls or compete for talk time. PC-type applications, productivity applications, mobile commerce, all get in the way of making a call. People just don't want to compute on their phones, he argues. And it's not just apps affected by these rules: They apply to the device itself as well. The Nokia Communicator, newly released in the U.S., is a nifty small computer, but you have to close the lid to use it as a phone. There is also the appropriateness issue; just because your gadget can play music doesn't make it a stereo�or a stereo replacement.

So the closer you can stay to the top of this list, the better your chances of success.

He thinks the music and photo boom in Japan and Korea may be just an early-adopter fluke. Video telephony, on the other hand, he thinks is cool�you can look at people while you talk to them.
[/quote]

There really is a lot in this to take in, with some bits more useful than others so take a read and let us know what you think.

The Nokia Communicator, newly released in the U.S., is a nifty small computer, but you have to close the lid to use it as a phone.

Oops. Even the original Nokia 9000's (which I still have if anyone wants a laugh at some jpg's) were able (and proud) to be used as Speakerphones, with dialing from the Contacts and Telephone screens.

The Nokia Communicator, newly released in the U.S., is a nifty small computer, but you have to close the lid to use it as a phone.

Yeah that just about says it all about the Nokia. People end up looking sill when they say things like this.

Its is a very good article (and there is a certain element of truth in the argument). I just don't think the analysis is good.

For example Camera phones will do well because they are 'cool' and fun. I might draw an analogy with SMS - to be honest most of the time when sending an SMS it be just as easy to phone the person, but that doesn't stop some people sending 10's of the things a day.

The other thing I'd say is that the handset market is going to be divided into various levels. There will be the basic handsets that are propoetary OS or something like BREW, and then the more advanced ones which will use Symbian. IMHO Symbian's sucess is going to be closely linked with how far done it can go. What they need is even the simpler phones running Symbian OS. At $5 a handset Symbian OS is cheap so that's never go to be a major factor, and when you consider what it does in terms of unifying contacts etc its a really killer.

Symbian at 0% I dont think so.. more like 30%, propietary 60% and MS / Palm etc at 10%

(1)

Symbian are chargin $5 for the kernel of a 'smartphone' and a further $5 for the Pearl UI - surprisingly Nokia are only using the Kernel and are supplying System 60 themselves (and to others). As it's not a Symbian UI, they get less cash than if Nokia went the whole hog.

(2)

Nokia have a few classes of phones. The 92x0 is a "business" phone, the 7650 is a "Lesiure/imaging" phone, and they also plan an "audio" and two others I can't remember.

(3)

While the theory that people want to talk and everything else is secondary is good on the surface, it's not what people really want. I;ve had mobile email now since 1994 and the Series 3a (using a then experimental email/sms gateway) and the Telenote SMS software. *Thats* what I want, portable email and messaging with good games.

(4)

The should buy outright either EBook or EpocwareBookReader and bundle it with the machines. I'mk going through Harry Potter on the 9210 at the moment. It's weird, but when people ask what I am doing, "Reading Harry Potter" is the least expected answer... but it gets some good looks of amazement and awe.