Read-only archive of the All About Symbian forum (2001–2013) · About this archive

Comparing the 9500 and the 9300

12 replies · 5,360 views · Started 08 September 2004

[FONT=Times New Roman] : WHICH IS BEST :[/FONT]

I THINK MOST FEMALES LIKE NOKIA 9300 MOSTLY.
MAN ALSO LIKE
WHICH BETTER

I THINK MOST CONSUMERS GO FOR 9300 BCOZ THIS IS SMALL,SLEEK;GOOD LOKKING COMMUNICATOR.

CHEERS MATE

Ewan wrote:Everyone is probably thinking one thing right now. What's the difference between the 9500 and the 9300. Well, Ewan's had a look at both phones, and here's the not-quite definitive guide to the differences between the two Symbian OS 7.0 powered Communicators.

Ok, here's me nitpicking again. 😃

The picture you posted doesn't accurately reflect the size differences between the Communicators, as the 9500 is not as tall as the 9210.

And the weight of the 9300 is not 147g, but 167g.

And another difference not yet mentioned between the 9500 and the 9300 seems to be that the 9300 can be opened all the way up, as illustrated on the "Phone Demo" and "Spotlight" links on Nokia.com.

I really like the 9300 because the size is great and the looks are OK (I'd prefer black over silver though). And I love the fact that it doesn't have a camera. But too bad Nokia always manages to f@ck things up. This time by putting such a low capacity battery in there. :evil:

Those mobil.idnes.cz photos are fantastic...thanks for linking!

jazzy1 wrote:[FONT=Times New Roman] : WHICH IS BEST :[/FONT]

I THINK MOST FEMALES LIKE NOKIA 9300 MOSTLY.
MAN ALSO LIKE
WHICH BETTER

I THINK MOST CONSUMERS GO FOR 9300 BCOZ THIS IS SMALL,SLEEK;GOOD LOKKING COMMUNICATOR.

CHEERS MATE


hi jazzy
u were dieying to get 9500
wht abt not
or u r confused while seeing 9300