For work reasons I am using both of them these days. I prefer the one-hand operation of the S60 to the stylus approach of UIQ but I can't avoid to blame Nokia even more for the shortcomings in the N6630 design, now that I can compare certain things:
- 1GB Memory Stick Duo Pro in the SE P910i; ok bloody Sony proprietary technology but I found it in the first shop I tried!! And it's 1GB!! Still waiting for DV RS MMCs!
- Passthrough connection to the internet via bluetooth and pc connection: SE P910i: zero configuration; you just connect the BT serial port and browse with Opera, check mail and whatever; N6330: NADA!
- Mail synch: with P910i I can synch all my mail at work and read it on the subway or at home; why this isn't supported by Nokia I really don't know.
- Internal memory: P910i has 64MB of internal memory so you can install ALL programs there, not on external memory; this way you can swap memory cards but still have access to all programs. N6630: basically no internal memory available, all large programs must be installed in the memory card.
- Phone stability: P910 not a single reboot in 10 days; N6630: well you know....
I am not saying that the 910i is perfect: it doesn't support EDGE or 3G, the camera is only 640x480; but my question is: why does Nokia leave a lot of important features out of their phones?
To add more I could say that for the P910i sync station, carrying case, kit to add or remove keyboard, etc, are all included in the box.
Comments welcome......
UA
Utenteanonimo64 wrote:For work reasons I am using both of them these days. I prefer the one-hand operation of the S60 to the stylus approach of UIQ but I can't avoid to blame Nokia even more for the shortcomings in the N6630 design, now that I can compare certain things:- 1GB Memory Stick Duo Pro in the SE P910i; ok bloody Sony proprietary technology but I found it in the first shop I tried!! And it's 1GB!! Still waiting for DV RS MMCs!
- Passthrough connection to the internet via bluetooth and pc connection: SE P910i: zero configuration; you just connect the BT serial port and browse with Opera, check mail and whatever; N6330: NADA!
- Mail synch: with P910i I can synch all my mail at work and read it on the subway or at home; why this isn't supported by Nokia I really don't know.
- Internal memory: P910i has 64MB of internal memory so you can install ALL programs there, not on external memory; this way you can swap memory cards but still have access to all programs. N6630: basically no internal memory available, all large programs must be installed in the memory card.
- Phone stability: P910 not a single reboot in 10 days; N6630: well you know....
I am not saying that the 910i is perfect: it doesn't support EDGE or 3G, the camera is only 640x480; but my question is: why does Nokia leave a lot of important features out of their phones?
To add more I could say that for the P910i sync station, carrying case, kit to add or remove keyboard, etc, are all included in the box.
Comments welcome......
UA
both of them are very good phones,euquipped with many many features and possibilities,but its hard to compare them.its on a personal choice that what features do you need and prefer... SE is better in the case of memory and sychronisation capabilities and Nokia is better in imaging and of course high speed data acces thanks to EDGE and 3G.If i have to choose which one... my choice would depend from the fact that if there is 3G in my country.... if not,than its better to buy the P910i,but if there is a 3G network,than its better to buy a Nokia,because its important if you can browse the web and download files faster and use better services 😃 but both of them are.And if w are talkong about stability... i have bought mine 6630 more 3 months ago and its good,only 3 restarts in 3 months 😉 but maybe its only the luke of firmware version 😃 but iam very happy and satisfied with this device...
I was tempted by the P910i, I've had a T68 and a T610 in the past, both excellent and the T68 was near unbreakable. I also looked at the O2 XDA series. Ultimately my choice came down to the fact that I wanted a phone with extra abilities and not a PDA that I could use as a phone.
Persoanlly I like SE phones more than Nokia phones for its great features..But I couldn't dare to buy SE phone, I own Nokia 6630...because Applications are widely available for Nokia than SE.. Nokia is much cheaper than SE phones.. they not only can get repaired easily but they have good resale value in India..And nokia supports every GSM operators very well, where BSNL sims don't seem to be working on SE phones.. so no matter how great features SE offers over Nokia phones, Nokia is still WINNER.. But Nokia should improve their phones to match latest technology.. to win the race of smartphones.. don't know why, nokia takes steps so slowly..
personally, i like the p910i..its lovely...but...i find it laborious...ive owned several se phones in the past, my favourite being the t68i...one of the best phones ever made...however, using the stylus, is for me, irritating...i had a good browse through the phone this past week, and its very nice but it does have issues...its a brick...the querty keys on the flip are far too small, the camera, even for a vga, is truly shocking...i was gobsmacked....im currently using the 6630, of which i have never had any problems with it at all..(i bought it sim free from my workplace), and for me, i prefer the nokia to the p910i...but hey...thats just me... 😃