Read-only archive of the All About Symbian forum (2001–2013) · About this archive
All About Symbian Forum Archive

Differences in photocapture utils

4 replies · 1,885 views · Started 20 November 2002

thegrey 20 Nov 2002, 12:40

I now have 3 different way's to capture photo's on my 7650.
the first is with Photographer in high settings
and with Photographer in normal setting ( http://www.softwaremarket.nokia.com/DRHM/servlet/ControllerServlet?Action=DisplayProductDetailsPage&SiteID=nokia&Locale=fi_FI&productID=583300 )
and the second with the standard capture software on your phone.
third is camerafx, but that's so bad quality i won't even post it here.. :-?

The new capture software (photographer) is already my favorite. It has for what I see a slightly better zoom then cameraFX and has a couple of extra's. Like making a photo of someone in a dollarbill or crocodiles mouth and a wanted poster.
There are 3 capture settings..basic, normal and high. (normal 25kb high 50kb)
Also you can adjust a lot of colors, like making the photo look very old or black and white. I didnt test the nightsetting yet because...well...it not dark outside yet. 😛
And it also has a nice Panorama capture abbility.

Too bad photographer will set you back 20 euro's...

TheGrey

TheSpecialBoy 20 Nov 2002, 20:40

The focus for the objects in the background is not so good. Ikike the 2`nd one, made at normal.

The diferences are quitre visible if you are looking in the back. Also the sun was not favorabile in the 1-st pic I think.

seanmiguel 21 Nov 2002, 04:57

[quote="Manowar"]Damn, I can not appreciate differences! :-?[/quote]

here, here! it's like there aint any at all!

neuerkunde 23 Nov 2002, 16:32

hi,

could u post a few similar pics taken with FX, photographer and orig. nokia cam app?

just want to see the quality differences between these progs.
i have already recognized some differences between nokia and FX apps.

Seems as if the nokia app. generates better image quality. filessize of the taken pics indicates that too:

nokia (high) ~ 30kb
FX (high) ~26kb

so now photographer ~ 50kb as u said...
would like to see the quality difference....