Signing with DevCert gives 'Unable to install' error

It should work. Can you provide mmp files and pkg files for case that works,
and case that does not work.
Regards
H

"St�phane Lenclud" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Hi all,
>
> I'm new to v9 and the signing process.
> I wanted to use protected UID with developer certificate but on my Nokia
> 3250 I'm getting 'Unable to install' message at the very end of the
> installation process. If I try using that same developer certificate
> with unprotected UID it works just fine.
>
> Is that the expected behavior? If so at which point do you have to
> switch to protected UID? Just before submitting your application to the
> signing process? I thought developer certificate would let you use
> protected UID since they are valid only for a very limited set of
> devices specified by IMEIs.
>
> Cheers,
> St�phane Lenclud.
>
>

Hi Hamish,
Thanks for your answer.

-For the case that works just use the Helloworldbasic example from the
S60-3rd-MR SDK and sign the SIS file with self-signed cert.

-For the case that does not work use the same example en replace the
UIDs with a protected UID -there is two UIDs in MMP, one in PKG, on in
reg resource, one in code- then sign it with a DevCert. I was using a
DevCert for one IMEI with all possible capabilities and Helloworldbasic
needs none.

Cheers,
S.

Hamish Willee wrote:
> It should work. Can you provide mmp files and pkg files for case that works,
> and case that does not work.
> Regards
> H
>
> "St�phane Lenclud" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...[color=green]
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I'm new to v9 and the signing process.
>> I wanted to use protected UID with developer certificate but on my Nokia
>> 3250 I'm getting 'Unable to install' message at the very end of the
>> installation process. If I try using that same developer certificate
>> with unprotected UID it works just fine.
>>
>> Is that the expected behavior? If so at which point do you have to
>> switch to protected UID? Just before submitting your application to the
>> signing process? I thought developer certificate would let you use
>> protected UID since they are valid only for a very limited set of
>> devices specified by IMEIs.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> St�phane Lenclud.
>>
>>
>
>[/color]

Hi,
I eventually managed to get a DevCert working with protected UID on a
Nokia N91. Don't know what's wrong with my 3250, I'll try again soon 😉
Cheers,
S.

St�phane Lenclud wrote:
> Hi Hamish,
> Thanks for your answer.
>
> -For the case that works just use the Helloworldbasic example from the
> S60-3rd-MR SDK and sign the SIS file with self-signed cert.
>
> -For the case that does not work use the same example en replace the
> UIDs with a protected UID -there is two UIDs in MMP, one in PKG, on in
> reg resource, one in code- then sign it with a DevCert. I was using a
> DevCert for one IMEI with all possible capabilities and Helloworldbasic
> needs none.
>
> Cheers,
> S.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Hamish Willee wrote:[color=green]
>> It should work. Can you provide mmp files and pkg files for case that
>> works,
>> and case that does not work.
>> Regards
>> H
>>
>> "St�phane Lenclud" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> news:[email protected]...[color=darkred]
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I'm new to v9 and the signing process.
>>> I wanted to use protected UID with developer certificate but on my Nokia
>>> 3250 I'm getting 'Unable to install' message at the very end of the
>>> installation process. If I try using that same developer certificate
>>> with unprotected UID it works just fine.
>>>
>>> Is that the expected behavior? If so at which point do you have to
>>> switch to protected UID? Just before submitting your application to the
>>> signing process? I thought developer certificate would let you use
>>> protected UID since they are valid only for a very limited set of
>>> devices specified by IMEIs.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> St�phane Lenclud.
>>>
>>>
>>
>>[/color][/color]