Hi,
I am pretty much settled on going Nokia for my next phone. The WM5 choices just look to cheap to me (too fragile, etc) and Symbian looks the better interface.
I have a Nokia 6200 now. I like it but outlook sync is flawed, it is dated, and is really just a phone (no convergance)
It looks like the N73 may be the best choice in terms of features, but (and it is a big but), it looks from what I read, to have a lot of bugs still, and the build quality seems less than other Nokias (reports of loose camera sliders, etc.)
So folks - how bad is it, really???
Here is what i am looking for, in order of importance:
[LIST=1]
[*]Solid Phone with all 4 bands (I use 850 in US, and travel to Asia)
[*]Small size (pockeable)
[*]Syncs to outlook PROPERLY
[*]Ability to read E-books
[*]Music / MP3
[*]Camera - But no camera is better than a poor camera
[/LIST]
Note - I do go places that do not allow a camera phone occasionally, but can deal with that as long as the camera in the phone is good enough to make it worth the hassle - if not, i'd just as soon have NO camera (i.e. the no camera vresion of the E50...)
I have read reviews all over and the 2 phones I am considering are:
E50 (+ small, low cost; - 1.3 MP, smaller screen)
N73 (+ best camera, 2.4" screen; - price, buggy)
so it really comes down to how much better the camera of the N73 is, and how much difference the extra 1/3 in of screen size makes in book reading as comparted to how buggy it is, with the price as a tie breaker.
So you N73 folks - what do you think here?
TIA,
Rick