ok, Ive used CameraFx and Photographer over the past 3 weeks, I wanted to know what the best actually was. CameraFX won the battle. Here is some of my reasoning.
Quality: Standerd no zoomed were similar, however cameraFX was a franction better... The standerd photo app however is better than them both for standerd shots.
ZOOMING Some argued photographer was better quaility when zooming, However AT THE SAME zoom levels, quality was actually prefreable using cameraFX. note, camera FX does have MUCH higher zoom levels 😮 , so obviously quality will drop off with increased zooming.
Size: CameraFX is smaller in size, however, the pictures taken with photographer are smaller [about 15% smaller in kB], however, the larger size of photographer negates the advantage of smaller photo files, therefore making cameraFX prefrable.
Functionality: Ok, here they both stray in totall different directions, Both have appealing functions, Photographer has panaroma, and CameraFX has ... well everything else... I found them both fun, but mostly i didnt use these features, and only occasionaly i used some on cameraFX
So after that, I thought cameraFX, smaller, better quailty, better zooming. I wont say better features, because there both too different, however i preffered the feature set on CameraFX
Did you take into account that Photographer fixes the 'barrel' type-problem that occurs because of the 7650's lens?
That didn't make much sense, did it?
Take a picture of a doorway, or something with straight lines.
With the 7650's built-in software, the lines come out a little 'bent', but Photographer fixes that.
Just looking at the same file, the 7650 Camera app's picture took about 34kb (high quality), but Photographer's was about 23kb.
Photographer itself, however, is a bit on the big side..
[quote="Snorbaard"]Did you take into account that Photographer fixes the 'barrel' type-problem that occurs because of the 7650's lens?
That didn't make much sense, did it?
Take a picture of a doorway, or something with straight lines.
With the 7650's built-in software, the lines come out a little 'bent', but Photographer fixes that.
Just looking at the same file, the 7650 Camera app's picture took about 34kb (high quality), but Photographer's was about 23kb.
Photographer itself, however, is a bit on the big side..[/quote]
I did take that into account, however i included that in the 'feature set' summurization, However at closer proximitey [below .8Meters] It can actualy reverse the effect to give a inverse barrel effect. I hope this answerd your question
[quote="filicomp"]if you tells![/quote]
Nothing against you filicomp, but this is your second past... that... makes no sense 😮
I have Nokia 3650 (Firmware 3.13). I am using Camera FX 1.31, but the pictures taken by it get automatically stored only on the phone memory. Is there a way of storing pictures on MMC (other than using cut and paste after taking picture)? I have sent an email to www.wildpalm.co.uk but they are just not responing.