Steve, couple of issues...
It was close, oh so very close, to my ideal/current phone, but the grid failed for a key reason or two, some of which others already mention in the existing comments.
You see, my previous phone was N95 Classic.
My new phone is N82.
But the grid suggested N95-8GB as the winner, and the N95 Classic as the runner up.
Why is this so wrong though, given that my last phone was indeed an N95...?
Form Factor!
I do not like at all, sliders (where a choice NOW exists, but didn't at the time I got my N95), but of course, whilst this is sufficiently important enough to be the one and only deal-breaker for many people, your grid doesn't even include something as fundamental as this. The closest you get is something about size/weight, but that's no use as this would just as much fail the fairly bulky N82, whose actual form factor and size I DO like.
So the Grid suggested my ideal phone as an N95-8GB even though this is nowhere near the case, as I was unable to give it any input into favouring Monoblock over slide, over flip.
I would urge you to add that criteria in ASAP, as outlined - so you can give weight to a monoblock or flip, or slide preference if you have one.
Finally, to add to prior comments, giving the N82 a 5 score for local connectivity just because it omits Infra-Red is way too severe/out of proportion a penalty. I know you like the backward reliance on IR, but most others don't and even then, if they did, as I say, this is too disproportionate a weighting penalty. Bar IR, it's the most connected device in device-dom. So to hit it with a 5 is utterly wrong IMHO - it's disproportionate.
And as also mentioned, it's camera weighting wants to stand out even more, from the rest - i.e. be given an even higher weighting score.
Hope these comments help to make the Grid an even more reliable and useful tool.