Please answer, It is Fun
Two ethical Questions:
> 1. First Question
> Suppose ou know a women preignant wich has allready 8 kids. 3 of them deaf, 2 blinds and one blind. The women has syfilis. Would you advise her to have an avortion?
>
> 2. 2-nd Question:
>It is the time of World President allection, and your vote will determine the choosen one. Who will you pick? Here are the 3 candidates:
Candidate A has:
> Connections wit corupted politiciens, believes in astrology. It had allready 2 extra marital connections. Smokes like a snake and drinks up to 8-10 glases per day.
> Candidate B was fired 2 times, sleeps until after lunch, during college was taking drugs, and drinks 250ml whisky every night.
> Candidate C is a man with medals and war hero. It is Vegetarian
> ,Drinks only beer, and this only ocasionally, never had extraconjugal affairs
>
> From these three candidates, Who will you pick?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >.
> >
> >..
> >
> >....
> >
> >....
> >
> CandidateA is Franklin D. Roosevelt.
>
> Candidate B is Winston Churchill.
>
> Candidate C is Adolf Hitler. ...
>
> You always must pay attention to the people that leave by the book 😉
> !!!
>
> BTW, if at the question about abortion you answered yes, You just killed Beethoven! 😉
Number one is easy: syfilis can be cured (nowadays), so no need for the abortion. 😊
Number two is more tricky, and I'm going to spoil your fun now. You probably first answered C and then thought you had made the wrong choice. But maybe you didn't. It's funny how TheSpecalBoy picked these three candidates, but they have been in the focus of argumets about suspected brain dysfunction in world leaders.
A quote from a medical article (I make it smaller so those who don't want to read it, dont have to scroll too much) Toole JF. Link AS. Smith JH. Disability in US presidents report. Recommendations and commentaries by the Working Group. The Working Group on Presidential Disability. Archives of Neurology. 54(10):1256-64, 1997:
The problem recurred when Thomas Woodrow Wilson sustained several "small strokes" while at the Paris Peace Conference during the early months of 1919. Physicians cared for his illness, but he continued to represent the United States even though his thinking was impaired. �
...A similar situation occurred during the latter years of the incumbency of Franklin Delano Roosevelt. Stricken by poliomyelitis in 1921 and thereafter unable to walk, Roosevelt was impaired but able to serve in office. As commander in chief of the US military, he met the challenges of the dictators of Germany and Italy and of the Japanese militarists. He had overall responsibility for a global war while suffering the complications of uncontrolled severe hypertension. He almost ignored medical advice, and, by the time of his fourth election in 1944, Roosevelt was in the very late stages of heart failure and cerebral vascular disease. There is considerable controversy about the degree to which these disorders affected Roosevelt's reluctance to "stand up" to Stalin at the Yalta Conference of February 4-11, 1945. However, there is general agreement that dementia affected Roosevelt's refusal to join British Prime Minister Winston Churchill in a military operation to occupy Berlin, Germany, and Czechoslovakia in advance of the Russians during the last months of the war in Europe. Roosevelt died of hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage soon thereafter on April 12, 1945.
Churchill was not in a better physical and mental state himself, but I will spare you the quotes. My point is, that regardless of the ethics here, health should be preserved and world leaders are not immune to illness. If candidates A and B had been in better condition, maybe candidate C would have had less power. :-?
How do I know this? Mental capacity of the acting president has been an issue in Finland, and if you're interested, you can read this
Well, enough of serious talk, let's go back to waffle 😉
ok so i killed Beethoven.
and Franklin D. Roosevelt is my President.
so what....