Read-only archive of the All About Symbian forum (2001–2013) · About this archive

Defining the Smartphone - part 2 (testing the definition, head to head)

31 replies · 12,784 views · Started 26 July 2010

Yes, the list is weighted. But your marks still seem to be off - you gave desire and mini 8 points in calendar/agenda section. Shadamehr's example clearly shows that the advantage Desire has is a lot bigger. You suggest that the difference in e-mail between Desire/iPhone and N97 mini is one point? That's a bit shocking. And both the legend and mini get 8 points for general speed impression? Web browsing on N97 mini is just "one point worse" than on iPhone or Desire???

slitchfield wrote:Android isn't miles ahead of Symbian. If anything Android is several years behind Symbian, technically, but a year or two ahead in terms of UI flexibility and response, and in terms of Internet integration.[/url]

Sure, Android *is* less mature, and it shows in some areas. But, at the same time, I think is technically more advanced (or at least it feels that way, and I'm not talking about eye-candy but about how the OS seems architected, how it manages tasks & memory, how fast is developing, how easy is to develop for it and extend it). A more modern OS which hasn't yet reached maturity but has space to grow and feels fresh.
I don't think Nokia would explore the Maemo/Meego way if Symbian would hold so much room for development in the future.