6600... the worst photo quality among 3650/6600/7650 — Nokia 6600 and 6620

JasonT 21 Jun 2004, 08:37

erdemg� wrote:are you sure?? are they same quality??? Because their kb are different one is 74 kb the other one is 45kb. I am talking about the first photos.compare about 3650 6600 7650

Seen 4 36xx's all good cameras in them (I think the default brightness may be more than the 6600 so you also notice it on the screen). My first 6600 sucked for pictures, my second was great, my new third sucks again (the first two box codes had the same place of manufacture only a couple of days apart). Yes, there is a difference in between 6600 phones. I think they're even selling new lenses for the 36/35x series phones now.

Today I shot the same pic w/ a 3650 and my 6600. 6600 shot was much worse. It's like the contrast is bad to begin w/. I have to admit the resolution shown in the first pictures of this thread was much worse than I saw.

Still, nokia is upgrading their camera's slowly but surely (another year another phone cept the sonyericssonsonsonscons are so enticing.

rasofzr 09 Dec 2004, 19:29

f205 wrote:Check these out and tell me what you think...
all photos are shot by nokia's original camera program @ high quality.
-------------------------------------
this is 3650 @ standard mode
this is 7650 @ standard mode

this is 6600 @ standard mode

--------------------------------------
this is 3650 @ standard mode
this is 7650 @ standard mode

this is 6600 @ standard mode

-------------------------------------
this is 3650 @ standard mode
this is 6600 @ standard mode
-------------------------------------
seems like 6600 has the WORST photo quality...😡