N/A wrote:With something like 20-30M Windows Mobile devices made, Symbian's recent statement of 126M Symbian based devices (or Nokia's earlier 100M S60 devices announcement in April), I think it'll still be a while before Windows Mobile "massively" overtakes Symbian.
🙄
I was talking about software development, not unit sales, smart arse.
And it has, take your head of of your Symbian sandpit and take a look at the massive wealth and quality of software available for Windows Mobile now and you see that it's leagues ahead. For every Fisher Price Symbian application, there is 10 that are far far better. It's a whole different world. Shame the Nokia fanboys that have never properly used some of the newest WM6 phones still seem to think they are some kind of corporate business tool. Ignorance is bliss though i guess. If the 95 is a "Multimedia Computer", then a Windows Mobile Phone with the right software (mostly free i might add) is a "Multimedia Super Computer With Bells On".
robgreb wrote:Perhaps we should pester Nokia to release really buggy underdeveloped phones with poor functionality...
<dons flameproof suit>
What, you mean like Nokia's bug free (not) efforts, with half arsed GPS (HTC only use Sirf Star III), limp WiFi, no touch screen and terrible battery life? We don't need to ask them because they already do. The N95 is by far the best, and the N73 was ok after a few firmware upgrades, but the rest of the N series has been a bug fest and a true show case of where Nokia's designers lost the plot.
Even out of the box, a bog standard WM6 phone has more functionality than my N95. In terms of it's hardware, OS and software. Although admittedly none have a 5mp camera, which is largely overrated anyway. Even call, txt and email is better, although i do prefer a hardware keypad for numbers (not that i use it much, 90% of my calling is done from contacts).
I get less problems and better battery life with my 2 and a half year old Vario. Have you seen the Vario III? - http://pdadb.net/index.php?m=specs&id=733
People need to have actual experience before making silly statements like the two i quoted above.
Don't get me wrong, I love my N95, but Symbian has no depth compared to where WM is now. And i really hated Windows Mobile 2003, it was a dog. Nothing like WM6 or even 5, it's like comparing Windows ME to Vista in some ways. I think a lot of people have had bad experiences with Windows Mobile 2003 and i have a fixed idea in their head of what its like now, and nasty at times it was too.
Oh, and remember this is all just forum banter people, i might be sharp sometimes but none of it's personal 😊 (flame proof suit at the ready anyway).