Im using Camera Fx at the moment [like the zoom] but apparantly i can get better picys with PHOTOGRAPHER - where can i get this from!?
Photographer for 7650!!!
[quote="Zipper"]Im using Camera Fx at the moment [like the zoom] but apparantly i can get better picys with PHOTOGRAPHER - where can i get this from!?[/quote]unfortunately there's no trial version available :cry: you need to buy the full version without trying it before. But a lot of people says it's a good program, so you could be quite safe by buying it 😉
[quote="faquick"][quote="Zipper"]Im using Camera Fx at the moment [like the zoom] but apparantly i can get better picys with PHOTOGRAPHER - where can i get this from!?[/quote]unfortunately there's no trial version available :cry: you need to buy the full version without trying it before. But a lot of people says it's a good program, so you could be quite safe by buying it 😉[/quote]
Yes thank-you! - ***BUT WITH THE HIGHEST TONE OF SARCASM*** - THANKS FOR TELLIN ME THE WEBSITE!!! Im Askin what the site is!! Does anyone know!?
Yes thank-you! - ***BUT WITH THE HIGHEST TONE OF SARCASM*** - THANKS FOR TELLIN ME THE WEBSITE!!! Im Askin what the site is!! Does anyone know!?eheheheheh
WHOOPS! 😮ops:
here are a couple of useful links:
I'm interested in buying photographer, but can someone post a pic taken with Camera, and another of the same thing with Photographer?
I need to know it's going to be worth my money.. Not worried about the zoom or editing side of things, just be good to have the built in enhancement, so I don't have to manually unblur the images etc
I'll email you or icq a couple of pics
Please excuse my dog for moving..... the first is from the phone on high res, the second with photographer on high res, no zoom. See if you can tell the difference! I bought this software with no trial, with a promise of add on's, mask etc and what have I, and all the others who are waiting got.........nothing. Anyway, you be the judge.
Can you please post the pictures here so everyone can see the difference 😊
photgrapher takes more space .... but It has 2 significant advantages ... Panoramic view and 4X zoom .... still digital camera is your answer if you wanna use this kind of features because 7650 just not meant to replace the digi camera hehe 😃 😃 for me I rather stick to the standard camera app 😃
Here they are.....
Still asking why I spent the money, apart from file size
17.8 KB compared to 23.4KB
Look in this thread for more examples:
http://www.allaboutsymbian.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=5162
@Jyrik - I did look there, the pics have been removed or something 😞
But in the above posted pics, they look the same to me, or if anything the one without photographer looks better ...
I can see why you'd be dissapointed! Don't think I'll be buying it, might have to find a 'free' version to trial to see for myself if it's worth the space on the phone...
whoever too kthose pis of the dog!! lil help for ya m8, go into the photograp[her settings and set the quality to HIGH not standard,
I think not.
[quote="theninjagecko"]whoever too kthose pis of the dog!! lil help for ya m8, go into the photograp[her settings and set the quality to HIGH not standard,[/quote]
I took the pictures of the dog......and trust me "M8", it is set on high...
but photo gropher takes 4 seconds more to process the pics, though i do agree it is better
well i get totoal diff result than u then m8, unless ur photogtapher is mashed up, i cans ee a BIIIIG difference!
I'm interested in buying photographer, but can someone post a pic taken with Camera, and another of the same thing with Photographer?
Here are few samples: http://www.pallokala.com/teemu/samples.html
Picture on the left is taken with original cam and on the right there is version taken with Photographer.
Best regards,
Teemu Moilanen
HI!...
I have Photographer..
The quality of images in quality high setting... is much
better than Camera FX or the Camera that came with the normal
nokia software...
This is because the JPG on HIGH is less compressed... with
CameraFX you can get JPG file size about 27 kb.. in HIGH..
With Photographer i get 67 kb... in HIGH.. much better quality..
more sharp and better color saturation...
The memory space that is used by Photographer depends on how
many plug-ins you want to use... i deleted some plug-ins (with FileExplorer) that i don't use.. like MASK Pictures, Gamma correction and others... i keep only Night Pic, ZoomPic, and Panorama Plug-in..
now the memory space used by Photographer is 140kb (60kb. Ziped with SpaceDoubler), the full installed app with all plugins use about 261kb.
This is the best program for the Nokia 7650 Camera that i ever seen...
CameraFX it's more for fun, but not for quality pics... with Photographer you can get better pics, not like a pro cam of course ... but i like to have software that really can get the best from the 7650 hardware.
cya!
Alejandro
[quote="AEFOX"]
This is because the JPG on HIGH is less compressed... with
CameraFX you can get JPG file size about 27 kb.. in HIGH..
[/quote]
I would like to make a (minor) correction here.
Not less compressed but more loosy compressed.
Jpeg compresion is a loosy compression like mp3 for sound.
In other words some info that would lost in normal setting for space saving would not lost in high.
Ofcourse the best way to see the photo in it's full quality is to save it in bitmap format but that is not,let's say, so wise!!!