Is 3.5mm jack compatible for tv output cable? Mini usb is fast enough for transferring large files compared to N95?
There is no 3.5mm jack, the 6120 has a 2.5mm jack. And no, there's no TV Out on the 6120.
The USB is faster than bluetooth, but I don't know what you mean by "fast enough". It was certainly fast enough for me.
First question: Sound quality. Have you compared the 6120 classic to the 5700 for bluetooth stereo audio quality with the same pair of wireless headphones? If so, same, better, worse?
I'd say the same. IMHO the choice of third party headphones affected the sound quality far more than the choice of phone. For some reason the bundled headphones are much quieter than third party ones, perhaps because of EU safety regulations.
Whatever phone you buy, get a 3.5mm adaptor (they're about £5 in electrical shops, don't have to be Nokia brand) and some third party headphones, it will make it sound much much better.
Second question: buttons. They look small like the (gasp!) N70's frightful mini buttons...are they bigger than the N70's?
I haven't used an N70, but as I said in the review the buttons are a bit small. I managed fine with them, but if you like your buttons to be big then I'd recommend something like the 6290 (you can compare their buttons in the photo in the review).
Third question: It looks like it is well designed for the hand. If one didn't care about the 3.5G would you prefer the 6290 over the 6120 Classic? 6290 doesn't have stereo bluetooth though, right?
I honestly think this is a question of personal taste. I like both but in different ways.
The 6120 was just so compact, it really did feel like a normal phone and not a smartphone. The small size did make the phone much more fun to carry and use.
The 6290 on the other hand has much bigger buttons and a slightly bigger screen. The 6290's screen is possibly the nicest of any smartphone I've used, it's flat against the glass and bright. But the 6290 doesn't have A2DP (bluetooth stereo) so that's a mark against it.
If you can, try these out in a shop, because you have to feel them in your hand before you can judge which one is suitable for you. They're both good, but they're different.
I am an expat living in Taiwan and the 6120 Classic will be nicknamed the "6120C" here (hasn't started selling yet), since most people here can't say the word "Classic" off the cuff...I wonder what other non-English speaking countries will do now that Nokia is "naming" its phones in "English"...(Of course Nokia Taiwan will still box it in a 6120 Classic box, but the locals will just call it 6120C)
The 6120 in Europe is technically called the 6120c, if you look at the nameplate under the battery it says "6120c".
If you want to get really nerdy, there's a number of other models that had letters after their name for some inexplicable reason, for example the 5500 is technically called the 5500d. I don't know what the reason for this is, perhaps it makes it easier and quicker to write shorter names when doing inventories and repairs etc?
Does anyone know if this phone is compatible with Tom Tom Mobile ?I dont mind which version on Tom Tom as long as its compatible!
If you can find a version of TomTom for Symbian S60 3rd Edition, it should work with the 6110 Navigator.