I soooooooooooo thought that this was finally the phone to replace my N82...
Until I saw that once again, it's yet another Nokia with LED not Xenon.
And forgive me, but I simply cannot possibly see how even the best LED can compete with a true Xenon... as it's not about the light LEVEL (which I still never see LED being able to equal anyway), but about light 'dispersal'.
Xenon is a burst of scattered light, to boost overall light levels.
LED is far too much a targetted, directed source of light, no matter what you do with it.
Exactly WHY, it should be said, it is good for video. But Photography requires SCATTERED, dispersed light.
So just like the very first two posters, Nokia, Nokia, what have you done..?
XENON ommitted..? oh man.
As for the poster that talks about frying your hand with a constant Xenon on for Video...
DOH.
Firstly, the percentage make-up of those using these devices for video, compared to those using them for photography, is MASSIVELY weighted... massively, far far more use these for stills, than video... indeed, asking my friends, they reckon they shoot about 1 video, for every 50 photos they take, if that. Some have never even shot a video at all, in all the time they have owned their phones (but even those who do, video is a tiny percentage of the two - and night video an even smaller mark).
So I am now SICK of Nokia's repeated weighting towards VIDEO, with an LED light.
Quite aside from the fact, that the simple answer to ALL of this, is a True Xenon for Flash Photography, above the lens, with a twin LED arrangement underneath, for Video, if Nokia are so desperate to see this feature included too, or push video so much.
How hard could that be, in "THE" premium, Flagship Photography device on the market, if this is what Nokia want the phone to be.
So me, I'll still stick with my N82.
To Nokia - I'll give it up ANY DAY, once you bring something better than it out.
But you haven't yet... and the N86 doesn't sound like it will either...