Unregistered - I'm glad you enjoyed the article.
You are more than welcome to get in touch direct with me and give more specific feedback than the 'usual general bias'. Or indeed comment directly here.
I would point out that this site is called All About Symbian so you will find Symbian focused information here, though maybe that's not what you mean by slant?
I imagine the reason the N86 has not be given a major push is that it is not considered a big seller potential. There's a big difference between technical excellence (of most interest to mobile geeks) and sales performance (generally much more price sensitive).
For those who are wondering, like I did, what the Goldman Sachs article referred to in the comment above is I think the commenter is referring to recent guidance that saw Goldman Sachs change its opinion on Nokia shares from a conviction buy to neutral (see here and here.
The opinion is primarily based on concerns around Nokia's high end portfolio, together with the effect of high end performance for brand image in the mid tier. It is worth observing that the Goldman note is a short term view. This note will get attention because Goldman Sachs is obviously a big name in investment banking.
This argument is not new and we've said repeatedly that Nokia is not performing well at the high end, especially if you draw a comparison to Apple.
Personally I think there too much focus on the high end (although this is where the profits are, which is of interest to short term and therefore share price, but is not directly linked to strategic strength), under estimates the mid tier space with regards to smartphones and ignores that none of Nokia's competitors has the same scope nor scale / reach in its service strategy (I guess the issue is that, in the short term, it will not realise significant profit from this).
Generally we don't post that often on analyst opinion stuff. Analysts do have a magic crystal ball - generally they have only a little more information (it at all) than that which is available publicly (which is why you sometimes get some very wacky predictions). Like any argument / opinion it is worth listening to anyone, but you have to make your own judgments on its validity.
I would also note that company stock performance does not always directly correlate with overall company performance (especially over longer periods).
Still I guess the downgrade to neutral makes a change from the Nokia is doomed story line!