A couple of responses:
First, thanks for reading the interview, and interacting with it. I appreciate that, since I doubt I get everything right, and am keen to refine my ideas.
Regarding "fixing" built-in apps:
This is something that's always needed on any platform. The OS vendor is never going to be able to meet the needs of all users with their suite(s), so there are always going to be alternatives.
Even when the OS vendor offers multiple levels of functionality (eg. MS's Outlook Express, Outlook, and MS Dynamics CRM) there is still plenty of room for alternatives.
I would hardly view this as "sad", and while I agree that S60 over-simplifies the PIM apps, there is a reason behind that strategy, it's not just stupidity on Nokia's part. (And no, it's not just to encourage ISV's -- if they wanted to do that they'd have the "vectoring" APIs I talk about.)
Regarding my negativity:
What some call realism others call negativity. Would you care to explain your reasons for thinking stuff from Silicon Valley is not "over hyped"? All I can say is that my assessment was based on straightforward evidence (fragmented development, small market, etc.).
Regarding an audio interview:
Speaking personally, I find audio presentations irritating because I can read far faster than I can listen (and I can do "random access" with my reading but only sequential access with listening). Having said that, I think the page could be laid out a bit more clearly, right Asri? 😉
However, I do understand that different people have different preferences, but unfortunately, since we did an email interview, the original is in text (it hasn't been transcribed, in other words).