>> To say Symbian is dead is missing the point.
Exactly. The death of Symbian OS is definitely exaggerated. Its a shame that the 'technical' press and bloggers would rather jump on a bandwagon than provide a well thought out analysis. We all agree that s60 is quite behind in the bells and whistles race but s60 is only a UI framework that runs on a very elegant OO based Symbian OS with a micro kernel architecture which is designed with power efficiency in mind (I should know, I've worked there before).
With bells and whistles being all the rage today, its easy to overlook the utility of this plucky OS.
For all the adulation that has been thrown at the feet of iPhone, its fair to say that it lacks such utility. The iPhone runs on a more superior hardware (600MHZ ARM cortex A8) than e.g. the N95 but yet Apple have crippled it to the point that it lacks full multi-tasking ( even when it pretends to have 2 browser windows open, you will find that only the in focus window is actually active; so should the non focused window be pointing to an Ajax web page, updates wont be reflected). This is a serious limitation which many with a voice are willing to ignore whereas usability issues of s60 are amplified and though not to blame for this, Symbian OS is derided in the process.
So Symbian is indeed far from dead - I am excited by Symbian Foundation and look forward to the introduction of QT and features such as DirectUI, Screenplay etc. I hope its the tenets of this gem OS is maintained as follows.
-> the integrity and security of user data is paramount,
-> user time must not be wasted, and
-> all resources are scarce.
Long live the Symbian Foundation!!.