In answer to the various comments about review writing and balance.
Steve has been writing about mobile device for far longer than I have and is very experienced and delivers high quality content day in day out. Personally, I think he's a better writer than I am.
Each of us writing on AAS has different writing styles and 'voices', and you may prefer one over the other (the feedback I get supports this - the number of people complaining about each style tends to even out over the long term). We always strive for balance in our reviews. We also aim to inform and entertain so you can make your own decisions.
From a purely practical point of view it's not really possible for one person to do all the reviews.
The writing team, collectively, has many years of experience and has tried and enormous number of devices (both Symbian and non-Symbian). I think it is that perspective that is most informative and valuable (or, put more bluntly, we have more knowledge, more experience, and a better understanding of both the individual devices and, very importantly, the overall context, than the vast majority of readers).
Of course people are entitled to their own opinions and I know I speak for all the team when I say reading constructive comments and feedback is one of the pleasures of writing on the two-way-web. I would hope that the writings on AAS help people make better decisions, but I imagine everyone would also include their own opinion / thoughts / experience when making a decision.
As with any writing though you should consider it in its context and make your own judgments about what weight it should carry for you. I've said repeatably that different people will view a device in very different ways. In or review we try to point this out as far as is possible (but it is impossible to write a qualifier for every view point for every review).
Honestly the comments in this thread rather irritated me. I've always had a policy of having minimal moderating on AAS, but I wonder if, in instances like this, it wouldn't be better to clean things up and just leave the N97 mini related content (that's what people reading this thread subsequently would what to see).
As such, going forward I would also ask that people try and keep the comments on topic. If you genuinely have concerns about content quality etc. you can email me directly.
---
In terms of N97 versus N97 mini - I do think the mini will outsell the classic, but there's also space for the N97 - people may want more internal memory space out of the box, FM transmitter, and/or a bigger screen. I know a lot of people on this forum have experienced issues with the camera slide / GPS etc... and I imagine the N97's coming out of the factory now have these things fixed and the new software...
That said I think I'd probably choose the N97 mini, especially as I imagine the price will drop a bit over the next few months, but it's not an easy call (I like the FM transmitter for example, but am not that bothered about screen size or internal memory). YMMV.
N97 mini mechanism - seems excellent in the ones I have tried (note I don't have one, but have seen quite a few at various events / shows). Nothing between it and the N97 as far as I could tell.