[quote="vincent168"]I have been an avid Ericsson Mobile Phone user for almost 5 years now. I don't think that the P810 is real because of these facts:
1.) The P810 is the name of an old analog NEC mobile phone that was released years ago - the NEC P810.
2.) Ericsson doesn't name it's new phones from it's older phones - (it would have been called the P900). IE: Ericsson 318, 628, 688, 888, T18, T28, T39, etc.
3.) Sony's latest handheld PDA CLIE has a camera resolution of 2 mega-pixels (much much higher than 1.3) . If you were coming out with a new device, it would have to out do any current technology that you have or your competitors would do it for you.
4.) The P800 has just been released in most countries. Ericsson isn't Nokia and won't release a newer model a few months a part.
5.) The P800 has a lot of bugs. They still have to refine it through numerous upgrades which they are doing.
6.) They just released a grey P800, and I bought one... 😉[/quote]
Why your avid points are invalid:
1) I think it seriously low in self esteem if a company were to bother about not naming their phones after any phone, even an old analog that was released years ago. P810 is a natural logical progression from P800.
2) Maybe where you are you haven't heard of T310 (from T300) and T610 (from T68)? If you see the SE's logic of model numbering, P900 would mean it's a totally different class from P800, just like the T300 is from the T200.
3) If you HAD seen the size of that Clie, PEG-NZ90, you would realize it's hell of a lot bigger than the P800. There IS a reason for that.
4) No matter how much I loathe having a new model out so soon, I agree with other posters that SE must keep themselves at the forefront. Judging by their lack luster market performance, I would see this a logical new marketing strategy.
5) At the time T68i was released, T68 still had a lot of bugs.
6) You are not alone. Would you prefer SE stops all sales of the P800 6 months before the release of the P810 so nobody would complain?